Home Features Top 10s Film Festivals Archive Hall of Fame Contact Search
Neil Young's Film Lounge

ASSAULT ON PRECINCT 13

7/10

USA 1976
dir John Carpenter
91 mins

By no means Carpenter’s best picture - it’s less accomplished than either his next feature Halloween, subsequent releases The Fog, The Thing, or the later Prince of Darkness, which it closely resembles - but it’s definitely his leanest and tensest, a ferociously economical cross between George Romero’s Night of the Living Dead and Howard Hawks’ Rio Bravo.

Carpenter sets up his scenatio with customary briskness, switching between various separate plot strands which gradually converge in Anderson, an LA ghetto. The police station (actually Precinct 11, Division 13) is closing down, the officers having already transferred to a newer facility nearby - only a skeleton staff remains to oversee the shutdown of the phones and electricity, including laid-back cop Bishop (Austin Stoker) and cool secretary Leigh (Laurie Zimmer).

Meanwhile, a vicious street gang vows revenge on the police department after some of their members are killed in a shoot-out... Meanwhile, a harassed fortysomething dad drives his young daughter around the underpopulated, deceptively calm streets in search of his new girlfriend’s house... Meanwhile, a prison truck picks up a trio of inmates, transferring them to a new jail - among them a notorious death-row veteran, the wisecracking Napoleon Wilson (Darwin Joston) - but on the way, one of them falls ill and needs medical attention. Meanwhile...

The story itself isn’t anything special - if anything, the set-up is slightly far-fetched, and the dialogue often strains uncomfortably towards hardboiled toughness. But few viewers will mind, so exciting is Carpenter’s slam-bang pacing, his astonishingly assured grasp of widescreen technique, and, not to be underestimated, the pounding relentlessness of his own, much-sampled, synthesiser score. It’s a no-name cast, but also no-nonsense one, a refreshing mix of races, genders, cops and crimimals thrown together, balls to the wall, as the street gang lay siege: lights out, phones cut, silencered bullets pinging around them in the claustrophobic rooms, they peek out through the shattered windows at the darkness beyond, where shadows lurk and stir to action.

In short, this film could hardly be better executed, especially on such a tight budget. And perhaps it’s unfair to expect much intelligence or depth from a quickie which seems so proud to be as ‘b-movie’ as possible. But there is something objectionable about the way Carpenter so gleefully exploits the worst paranoid fears of ‘respectable’ audiences: his level of debate never goes any further than Bishop’s despairing reference to ‘them crazy young bastards.’

 Walter Hill explored similar turf with in his 1979 picture The Warriors. As Danny Peary’s notes in Cult Movies:

Paramount’s initial poster ad featured a few hundred gang members looking straight at us defiantly, with a caption that began: ‘These are the Armies of the Night. They are 100,000 strong. They outnumber the cops five to one. They could run New York City.’ Now, this is scary stuff - especially if you live in New York City and happen to see the poster on a long subway ride home. If this ad did indeed properly reflect the theme of the picture it was promoting, then The Warriors could correctly be called an inciteful film.

Inciteful meaning the film could be accused of making the ‘gang problem’ worse, by causing the gang members to suddenly realise their own strength, and start acting accordingly.

Assault On Precinct 13, on the other hand, is inciteful, but it aims to rabble-rouse the potential victims of the gangs. While The Warriors is cartoonish, opportunistic and superficial, at least it bothers to give its gang members distinct personalities, separate identities, ideas, reasons, lives - and lines. In fact, we hardly ever hear from the ‘straights’ through whose worlds the warriors strut.

In Assault, there are dozens, perhaps hundreds of gang members, but, apart from a couple of mumbled phrases very early on, where four ‘warlords’ (they’re actually named in the end credits only as White Warlord, Black Warlord, Oriental Warlord and Chicano Warlord) take a blood oath of vengeance, Carpenter gives none of them anything to say. Carpenter goes to ludicrous lengths to make the gang members strenuously multi-racial - the unlikely nature of this is even commented on by a radio newscaster during an early broadcast mentioning the ‘juvenile gang problem.’ But the members nevertheless remain faceless, wordless, unstoppable, child-killing psychopaths, and so they presumably deserve all they get. They’re slaughtered, like zombies. Like injuns.

by Neil Young

-

Newly Added
  HST RIP
  Also showing elsewhere in Jigsaw Lounge...
  Flash Fiction by Adam Maxwell