|
RING
8/10
(Ringu)
Japan
1998
dir. Hideo Nakata
scr. Hiroshi Takashi (based on novel by Koji Suzuki)
cin. Junichiro Hayashi
stars Nanako Matsushima, Miki Nakatani, Hiroyuki Sanada
95 minutes
A
cracking horror thriller from Japan, Ring somehow manages to be
impressively different and original while at the same time stealing elements
from countless Western predecessors. Visually, there are nods to Poltergeist,
Videodrome, Carrie and Salem’s Lot, while the plot
borrows liberally from Candyman, and ‘Casting the Runes’, MR James’s
short story which formed the basis for Night of the Demon, with
even a little bit of HP Lovecraft (‘The Shadow Over Innsmouth’) in there
as well.
But
Ring is the exact opposite of Hollywood’s recent trend towards
knowingly ironic, camp comedy-horror movies. This is a downbeat, sombre
picture full of a typically Japanese sense of dread and mystery, an interface
between the modern, technological era and an earlier age of superstition,
curses and vengeful ancestors. If Ring occasionally provokes sniggers
rather than chills – it’s hard to know what to make of a film which pivots
on the phrase ‘Frolic in brine, goblins be thine,’ for example - that’s
mainly because the film was made primarily with domestic Japanese audiences
in mind. But even this ‘foreign-ness’ ends up as a plus, building up a
genuinely unnerving sense of unpredictable dislocation.
Seeing
Ring on the big screen is strongly recommended, especially in a
full house – there’s one big shock moment towards the end that, I can
attest, is capable of causing a large section of the audience to scream
in delighted horror – but, oddly, it is probably better on the small screen.
This is because the plot pivots on the malign influence of a ‘curse video,’
its power the focus of a fictional, but entirely believable urban myth:
after watching the video, the story goes, your telephone rings and a voice
informs you that you have exactly one week left to live.
The
story attracts the attention of divorced journalist Reiko (Matsushima)
after four teenagers, including her cousin, simultaneously drop dead.
She tracks down the tape, and watches its brief succession of bizarre,
haunting images. Then the phone rings, and the film becomes a race against
time as Reiko tries to to ‘exorcise’ the curse, which soon extends to
her surly ex-husband Ryuji (Sanada) and their young son, Yoichi (Nakatani)
also they also view the tape.
Ring
shows an unusual attention to detail at every level, from Takashi’s
multi-layered, evocatively elliptical script to Nakata’s no-nonsense direction.
The film has a deceptively flat, everyday look that contrasts all the
more strikingly with the arty experimentalism of the ‘curse video,’ and
the starkness of periodic black-and-white flashbacks - the rational world
thus disrupted and subverted by ‘impossible’ manifestations of evil. Kenji
Kawai’s eclectic score adds enormously to the cumulative impact of the
story, as does the technique of announcing each new day with an on-screen
title – it’s been done before in movies of all kinds, most notably The
Shining – but with such skilful ominousness.
Though
it works brilliantly as an intelligent thriller – and the final two scenes
wrap things up with a pair of especially satisfying twists – Ring
isn’t ‘just’ an scary horror picture. It subtly dramatises the tensions
in a Japanese culture that, no matter how urgently it strides into a westernised,
baseball-playing, high-tech future, can’t quite shake off the insistent
ghosts of its mystical past, just as Reiko is forced to abandon her air-conditioned,
neon-lit Tokyo office and head to the countryside, then to a wild, wind-swept
island, then into the very darkness of the earth itself, to confront the
demons that threaten her existence. And if many questions, many tensions,
remain unresolved – a sequel and a prequel have already been released
in Japan – that doesn’t mean Ring is either inconclusive or a lazy
cop-out. Like all the great horror directors, Nakata is primarily a collaborator.
He starts the circle – we finish it.
by Neil
Young
-
|