|
WHAT
EVER HAPPENED TO BABY JANE?
8/10
USA
1962 : Robert ALDRICH : 133 mins
Superbly dark
Hollywood horror-comedy-satire from the ever-fascinating Aldrich, featuring
one of the most remarkable Bette Davis performances - despite (or perhaps
because of) repeated TV showings, Davis's phenomenal work here has never
quite received the credit it deserves. She's a force of nature as the
title character, a bitter former thirties child star whose career nosedived
in adulthood while that of her sister Blanche (Joan Crawford) took off.
After Blanche was crippled in a mysterious car crash, the pair ended up
virtual recluses, grinding on each others' nerves in their Los Angeles
mansion. When Blanche decides it's time to sell up and find a smaller
place, Jane's grip on reality - never especially secure - starts to give
way...
As has been
very widely chronicled, the off-screen enmity between Davis and Crawford
was scarcely less vicious than Jane and Blanche's (see Shaun Considine's
500-page book on the subject, Bette & Joan - The Divine Feud)
and this adds a prickly edge to picture which the intervening decades
have done absolutely nothing to blunt. Indeed, so tight is the focus on
the acrimonious twosome that in some ways the picture packs more of a
punch than Billy Wilder's superficially similar Sunset
Blvd. (1950) - it certainly works better in terms of basic
thriller nuts-and-bolts, with the alcoholic, hammer-wielding Jane a genuinely
menacing (though ultimately pathetic) figure as she spirals into dementia.
But while
the film is essentially Davis's show (confined to a wheelchair, Crawford
doesn't have the scope to physically interpret her role the same
way) Aldrich shows a masterful touch with what could easily have been
campy, pulpy fare - just see how long he spins out the prologue before
finally bringing up the opening credits. It's a deceptively tricky
task, but he manages to strike just the right balance between laughs (Jane's
hilariously abrupt "conversations" with her "normal"
neighbours) and chills: What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? has lost
none of its power to entertain and disturb, and as such emphatically deserves
the big-screen limelight for which its heroines so destructively competed.
27th September,
2004
by Neil
Young
-
|